A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and six months.

Defendant

C Pronouncement of a sentence shall be suspended.

evidence of seizure.

[B] Defendant A is a public official (a public official during leave of absence) who is a public official (a public official) who is a public official in the support of the development of the Suwon District Law and is not a member of the E branch office in Seoul D. Defendant B is a founder of the Fudio room in which more than 120 believers participate (hereinafter “New G”). Defendant C is the motive of the above A as a public official of the Seoul High Court H and its affiliated public official.

The above church is a large church with 1.30,000 people registered, and I, the president of the church, was prosecuted on May 25, 2018 for the crime of habitual quasi-rape, etc. against the believers of the church, and was tried in the case of Seoul Central District Court 2018 Gohap522. The competent court tried the victims and the major witnesses under a provisional name on the ground of their privacy and personal protection, etc., and the victim's examination of witness was also conducted in private.

Defendant

A and Defendant B formed a consensus on the non-guilty judgment of I in exchange through Jable dialogue, etc. In order to this end, if Defendant A, who is a public official of the court, knows the real name of victims and the schedule of examination of the witness, Defendant A and Defendant B knew of the real name and the schedule of examination of the witness, Defendant A and Defendant B notified the victims of the fact that they believe that they were not guilty, and spread public opinion that they interfered with the attendance of the victims and that the victims did not know I.

Accordingly, Defendant A, the motive of Defendant C, discovered the real name of the victims and the schedule of examination of the witness, and disclosed the real name of the victims and the schedule of examination of the witness directly through G, etc., and Defendant B, which was known through Defendant A, continued to disclose the real name of the victims and the schedule of examination of the witness through G, etc.

【Criminal Facts】

1. A person who knows that a person who processed personal information provides another person with personal information without authority that he/she became aware of in the course of performing his/her duties, for profit or unjust.