The punishment of the lower court (one year and six months of imprisonment, and additional collection) shall be too unreasonable.

Judgment

It is advantageous that the defendant made a confession of all of the crimes of this case and made an illegal intent to obtain a subcontract to the victim without a construction license, and that the defendant was punished by a fine in violation of the Road Traffic Act around 1997, and that there was no other criminal record.

However, in light of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and various sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case and the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines (two to four years of imprisonment), the lower court’s sentence exceeding the lower limit of the recommended sentence cannot be deemed to be unfair because it is too unreasonable.

Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is not reasonable.