On October 25, 2013, the name of the court as of the date of service of the creditor, the case number of creditor 1, 2013, the debtor claim amount (won) of 2013, 1708 F E 50,000,000, 200, 2014, 2014, 2014, 4160, B 100,000, 350, 350,000, 350, 0004 on April 8, 2014, 200, 2014, Defendant C50,000, 350,000,000, 350,000 won on May 30, 2014, 3014, 350,000,000 won on June 20, 2014, 205, 2008,305,25,304

In the distribution procedure of the above deposited money withdrawn claim (hereinafter “instant distribution procedure”), which was commenced as Ansan District Court D, on October 28, 2014, the said court drafted a distribution schedule with the content of distributing the amount of KRW 2,32,774 to F; KRW 4,665,548 to Defendant B; KRW 16,329,418 to the Plaintiff; KRW 16,329,418 to the Plaintiff; KRW 2,332,744 to the Defendant C; and KRW 32,660,017 to the Plaintiff.

【In the absence of dispute, Gap 2-4 evidence (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the entire pleadings, and the plaintiff asserted that the defendants are the most recent creditor who conspired with the debtor E and the execution evasion, and against this, the defendants asserted the plaintiff's claim as the plaintiff's claim, rather than the plaintiff's claim for distribution against the fraudulent claim.

In addition to the purport of the entire pleadings in each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 6 through 8, the plaintiff was convicted of evading compulsory execution by participating in the distribution procedure of this case as the most recent creditor who conspired with Eul. On the other hand, the plaintiff was convicted of non-guilty charges due to lack of evidence against the charge of evading compulsory execution. On the other hand, concerning the distribution procedure of this case, the amount of the claims of the plaintiff against the plaintiff was 27,00,000 won and the amount of claims of the plaintiff against the plaintiff in the lawsuit of demurrer to distribution, which the debtor Eul filed against the plaintiff in relation to the distribution procedure of this case.