If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On October 4, 2016, at around 02:15, the Defendant: (a) reported 112 that he was suffering from disturbance in the front of Mat in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul; and (b) was employed by D’s circumstances belonging to the Seoul Yangcheon Police Station that he was called as having been employed by the Defendant, and (c) was called as having been employed by the Defendant;

The Babling theory, which was well known as "heat," was used to catch and trace the flab of the police officer.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and the prevention of crimes by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include: (a) the circumstance in which the defendant recognized and led to a mistake; (b) the degree of interference with the performance of official duties; (c) the defendant has no record of criminal punishment; (d) the circumstances leading to the instant crime; and (e) the circumstances leading to the instant crime; and (e) other conditions and conditions of sentencing and the conditions of examination (two million won).