When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around 00:40 on November 10, 2017, the Defendant, at the 310 underground parking lot, 310 Dongcheon-si Scam Scam Scam Scam Scam Scam Scam 119, the Defendant: (a) reported the Defendant’s vehicle driving accidents at the Defendant’s wife B, and reported the Defendant’s vehicle driving accidents at the site; (b) reported that the Defendant attempted to measure drinking to B who was seated at the driver’s seat; and (c) reported that the Defendant “this mp, police scam, and scam, have to take measurements of scam, have to do so, have to do so; and (d) used the Defendant’s shoulder and scam to scam the Defendant’s shoulder and scam.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (in case of field CCTV recording data),

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Since the reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, the sentencing guidelines do not apply to the recruitment of the workhouses.

Considering the fact that the police officer who conducts official duties assaults the police officer that the nature of the crime is not good, that there was a record of punishment for the crime of violence, that the defendant is against the confession of the crime of this case, the circumstances of this case, etc.