However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who has driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.132% on July 7, 2010, and on July 26, 2010, under the influence of alcohol level of 0.196% on July 26, 2010, and violated the prohibition on driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol at least twice.

On April 13, 2014, at around 03:30, the Defendant driven BM5 car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.196% in front of the original temperature room located in the Guambro-si, Guambro-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the actual state of the driver;

1. Previous records: Application of criminal records, inquiry records, and copies of summary order Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that even though there was a history of punishment for drinking driving as stated in the reasoning of sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the fact that drinking is very high, and that an order to attend a lecture causes a traffic accident during driving, the criminal liability is not somewhat weak.

However, in consideration of the fact that there is no criminal conviction or more than a suspended sentence, the punishment shall be determined as per the disposition.