준강제추행
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the fact-finding) is that the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, fluencing the victim into the taxi and leaving the taxi and contacted the body of the victim by getting the victim not to get out of the taxi, and did not commit an indecent act against the victim.
2. In full view of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, the Defendant’s assertion is rejected, as it is acknowledged that the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim under the influence of alcohol.
At the time of the police investigation, the victim stated that the victim stated that the taxi engineer “I am a taxi in the middle, open the rear seat of the taxi, open the rear door, close the rear door, and close the taxi,” “I am a taxi by settling the taxi cost by the card and pay the taxi up to G (the nine pages, 11 pages of the evidence record) and in the court of the lower court, “I amfl with the rear door on which the taxi was placed, and am a taxi.” The victim stated in the court of the lower court that “I amfl with the rear door on which the taxi was placed, and I am unflished, and I am unflished with the card when I am off at the taxi later.”
(83 pages). (b) The records of proceedings
According to the results of the taxi operation log and GPS analysis (Evidence No. 36 to 43 of the evidence record) of the taxi operated by the Defendant at the time of the instant case, the Defendant met for about 2 hours from 04:54 to 06:48 at the time of the victim’s daily walking to average of 10 minutes. Of them, the Defendant set aside a stop for about 21 minutes from 05:30 to 05:51, up to 06:51, up to 06:43, around 27 minutes from 05:30 to 06:51.