If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Around 09:20 on 15, 201, the Defendant assaulted the victim, such as assaulting the face of the victim with a flick hand, flicking flick, flicking flick, flick C victim D (ma, 37 years of age), and the Defendant’s flicking against the victim’s wife E, etc., on the part of the victim’s wife E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witnesses D and E's respective legal statements;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order asserts that the defendant's act is a legitimate act of self-defense or legitimate act, since the victim first gets satisfy and desires to bring about the defendant, and the defendant only satisfying the defendant's bath.

Comprehensively taking account of the evidence, such as the victim and E’s statement and investigation agency’s statements in light of the following: (a) the credibility of the statement is recognized; (b) the victim and E’s statements in this court and investigation agency; and (c) the defendant’s act is socially reasonable since the defendant’s act is reasonable in terms of sociality, as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court.

or the requirement of a legitimate act, such as reasonableness and supplement of the means or method of the act, shall not be deemed to have been satisfied.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion that the act of this case constitutes self-defense or legitimate act is without merit.