When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a QM6 car.

On April 24, 2020, the Defendant driven the above car at around 15:49, and 285 as in the white year in the Pappo City, but, in order to proceed to the opposite lane on the road along the two-lanes in front of the distance, the Defendant was making a U-turn at a non-speed speed.

Since the intersection where the signal lights and yellow domin lines are installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely making a U-turn at the point where the U-turn permission is granted in accordance with good faith by reducing speed and checking the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and her by breaking the center line to the center line in contravention of the signal, and her failure, led the Defendant’s opposite line to the private distance of the plaza station from the edge of the square station in the opposite line of the Defendant C ( South, the age of 66) by having the Defendant go to the private distance of the plaza station on the opposite line of the Defendant ( South, the age of 66) the front part of the DNA motor device driven by the Defendant more than the front part of the car driving by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim to die by occupational negligence as a multiple organ due to the divessis and damage at the F Hospital located in Simpo-si E around April 25, 2020, around 21:03.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of subparagraph (C) to a defendant's legal statement, a traffic accident occurrence report, a de facto investigation report, and a death diagnosis report on site;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The criminal liability of the defendant is heavy in that the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the Aggravated Punishment of the instant traffic accident

On the other hand, however,