2. The judgment of the defendant recognizes the facts of the crime, and is contrary to the nature of the crime, and it is recognized that some victims have partially repaid the amount of damage, but the nature of the crime is not good in light of the content of deception, the majority of the victims, the total amount of damage is not significant, most of the victims have not been paid, and the victims have not been agreed with. The defendant has already been punished ten times due to the same crime, and the defendant commits another crime in this case immediately after the completion of the execution of punishment due to the same crime, and commits another crime again, and other various circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records, are considered as inappropriate. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.