If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

On August 10, 2010, the Defendant testified to the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Court, Law No. 408 of Seocho-gu, Seoul Central District Court, to the witness of the case of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) against D, which is located in Seocho-gu, Seocho-gu, Seoul, to the effect that “the Defendant prepared and paid the gift tax,” and “the Defendant paid the amount of money held by the witness at that time, and 430 million won of the gift tax has been paid to D on July 16, 2001, and the witness paid the gift tax of 430 million won with the said money.” The Defendant testified to the effect that “The Defendant was the Defendant’s funds, and what is the grounds why D was the witness,” and “the Defendant was given the witness of the head of the Tong-gu, and made the testimony of the head of the Tong through questions as to whether or not he was the defense counsel’s money.”

The testimony was made as ‘the testimony'.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have paid KRW 430,00,000 to D, and 500,000,000 won deposited to D’s passbook was paid to D by visiting the bank by receiving the loan from D to E and holding the passbook directly.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in the first protocol of trial;

1. Statements made by witnesses D and E in the second trial records;

1. Protocol of examination of witness;

1. Copies of cashier's checks (No. 1603 pages of investigation records); and

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on each judgment;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or more;