However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 23, 2014, the Defendant is seeking to subscribe to an insurance policy with the victim C at the shelter located in the Gandong University Sung-si Hospital located in 170, Ganyang-si, Sinyang-si, 22, a 170-ro, Sinyang-si.

In this section, the name of the employee was stated in the name of the employee, stating that the gift should be 2 million won in order to spread the mind of the accounting staff who will take out the insurance and buy the insurance."

However, in fact, the list of employees presented to the victim that the defendant did not have the intention or ability to subscribe to group insurance because the defendant did not operate the company, was a list of employees discovered in the company garbage boomed by the defendant, and the amount received from the victim was thought to be used as the defendant's hospital expenses, drug value, living expenses, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received from the injured party the total sum of KRW 100,000,000 from the victim, namely, KRW 100,000,000,000,000 from his own seat, from around June 23, 2016, and acquired the total sum of KRW 33,50,000 from the victims every four times as shown in the list of crimes.

2. On July 6, 2017, the Defendant attempted to commit fraud: (a) at the shelter located in the Han River University Hospital located in Han River University on or around 10:30, the Defendant intended to subscribe to group insurance with the victim D.

In order to spread the mind of the accounting staff who will subscribe to insurance, I suggested a list stating the name of the employees, stating that the daily gift will be 1 million won, in order to call out the mind of the accounting staff.

However, in fact, the defendant did not operate the company and did not have the intention or ability to subscribe to group insurance, and the list of employees presented to the victim was the list of employees discovered in the company waste that the defendant had been employed before, and the amount received from the victim was thought to be used as the defendant's hospital expenses, drug value, living expenses, etc.