However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around August 10, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement that “IG will return IG up to 24 hours and up to 20:00 on August 11, 2018, to the staff in charge of the Damage Settlement Bank C located in the Gyeonggi City Development Bank Co., Ltd.” by phoneing the staff in charge of the Damage Settlement Bank Co., Ltd. located in B in the Gyeonggi City Development Bank.

However, in fact, the defendant was thought to obtain money by sirening a vehicle to another person for a long time.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received the said sirens from the victim’s employees in the vicinity of the Gyeonggi-gu E Elementary School located in the Gyeonggi-gu Seoul Metropolitan Area D, around that time, and obtained the four vehicles equivalent to the sum of KRW 75,903,286 in the same manner from around that time to August 20, 2018.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property from the victims.

2. On August 13, 2018, the Defendant, a monthly siren, posted an advertisement on the Internet using a siren vehicle, such as the foregoing 1. Around August 13, 2018, the Defendant reported that “IG will do so in KRW 200,000,000 per month,” and that “IG will do so in KRW 650,000 per month.”

However, as in the above 1. paragraph, the defendant did not have an intention or ability to sound a vehicle normally because he had a sirened vehicle to the victim on the condition of daily use as in the above 1.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 850,00 in cash from the victim near the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G building under the name of a siren, around that time, and received KRW 2,350,000 in total three times in the same manner as shown in the attached Table 2, as shown in the attached Table 2.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property from the victims.

3. The Defendant who attempted to commit fraud, at the end of August 18, 2018, committed fraud, and around 300,000 won and monthly 600,000 won with the victim F, as stated in the foregoing 2.