When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

After renting an officetel, the Defendant: (a) had an employee hired a female employee; (b) placed an advertisement of commercial sex acts on the Internet site, such as “C,” etc.; (c) had the customer who reported and contacted such advertisement; and (d) had the female employee engage in sexual intercourse similar to the female employee, upon receiving the price for commercial sex acts from the female employee; (c) around October 20, 2016, around 721, Seoul Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Building D, 120,000 won and receiving 1.20,00 won from male customer E, and had the female employee do sexual intercourse similar to F, from September 2, 2016 to October 1, 2016, the Defendant arranged commercial sex acts for the business of arranging commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Copy of the police statement made to E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing enforcement establishments;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (2) 1 of the same Act;

1. The sentence like the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances as to the sentencing reasons under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, and other conditions of the sentencing as shown in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relation, and circumstances before and after the commission of the crime.

- Business duration, type of business, number of female employees engaged in sexual traffic - - During the repeated offense period due to fraud, to the extent that there is a possibility of such criticism - there is no record of being punished for the crime of this case, such as recognition and reflect of the crime,