On February 19, 2017, around 23:00, the Defendant and B conspired to take advantage of the well-known structure of the gas station that he had previously worked at the gas station in the above station by cutting off money from the gas station.

The Defendant and B came to the “E gas station” located in D at the same time on the same day at around 23:50 days, and the Defendant informed B of the absence of employees in the gas station office using the Kakakao Stockholm, from the view of the network in response to the gas station. B entered the victim F cash-ownership KRW 506,000, Hyundai OO Bank's gift certificates KRW 50,000,000,000,000,000 won, which were located in the head of the relevant region, through a window that was not corrected behind the above gas station office.

As a result, the Defendant, together with B, stolen the property equivalent to the total amount of KRW 856,00,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the defendant in the first trial record;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of the police seizure protocol statutes;

1. The reasons for the sentencing of Articles 331(2) and 331(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts [the scope of recommending punishment] 4 types of general property (the theft) (one to two years) / Where a person intrudes into a place other than an indoor residential space (special mitigation (special mitigation (special mitigation) / Where a person systematically shares a crime (except for habitual offenders) / Where a defendant is sentenced to the suspension of indictment for the same crime on February 13, 2012 (excluding the case where a person is a habitual offender) / Where the defendant was sentenced to the suspension of indictment for the same crime on February 13, 2012. Some damaged articles were seized and returned to the victim, but the above defendant did not agree with the victim and did not endeavor to recover the damage of the victim, and the defendant refused to appear in the trial of this case, and all of the reasons for sentencing revealed in oral proceedings including the fact that he/she escaped, the sentence against the above defendant shall be determined as ordered.