On September 26, 2013, when driving the above vehicle on September 21, 2013 and driving the high-industrial public parking lot in the Dobong-gu, Daegu, Daegu, a driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents by properly operating the steering direction and operating the steering system accurately and safely.

Nevertheless, the subsequent part of the subsequent part of the Mad Victim C, which was parked by the negligent negligence of the Defendant, was followed by the vehicle behind the Defendant.

After all, the Defendant damaged the above occupational negligence in order to cover the amount of KRW 2,410,00,000, which is the repair cost, such as Oarba, Doer, etc.

2. The instant facts charged are crimes falling under Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the records, it is recognized that the victim C withdraws his/her intent to punish the Defendant on December 2, 2013, which was after the instant prosecution was instituted. Thus, the instant prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.