A. 1) The Plaintiff is the deceased’s children and the deceased’s grandchildren, who are children of the network M, who are children of the deceased K (K, L birth, death on July 21, 196, hereinafter “the deceased”).

The deceased’s children were M, and the wife N of the deceased died around June 9, 1970, and M around June 13, 2008.

B The original name is zero.

On June 6, 1985, P died without children among children of the network M.

(A) No. 4-13, No. 4-23, and No. 4-3 through No. 5) Defendant E is the deceased’s spouse of net Q (Death on September 24, 1997), and Defendant F and G are the descendants of net Q. The above Defendants are the successors of net Q. B. H 294 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

A) The former land cadastre concerning D, on July 28, 1919, indicated R as being the assessment of the instant land on July 28, 1919, and the said land is unregistered. (c) around August 2017, the phrase “the Plaintiff, the co-inheritors of RI, S, T, U, and V,” which read “the Plaintiff’s right to claim ownership transfer of the instant land against the deceased’s heir,” which read “the right to claim ownership transfer registration against the deceased’s heir,” in the letter of agreement on inheritance division of inherited property (Evidence 10-1), appears to be a clerical error in the “the right to claim ownership transfer registration against the deceased’s heir,” which read as “the right to claim ownership transfer registration against the deceased’s heir,” which read as “the right to claim ownership transfer registration of the deceased’s heir,” which read as “the ground for recognition on September 20, 1965 (No. 110 of evidence No. 3-2), Defendant B, number No. 1 or No. 30.

2. The defendant Republic of Korea cannot find that the deceased I purchased the instant land from the deceased, and the plaintiff's land on this case.