산지관리법위반등
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay this fine, 50,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
1. Although a person who intends to divert a mountainous district in violation of the Mountainous Districts Management Act obtained permission from the competent authority, the Defendant, while carrying out a new construction work of a church on the land outside of 3 lots outside of Dacheon-si from August 201 to August 201, 201, converted the use of a mountainous district without obtaining permission from the competent authority by cutting down trees with a total of 1,453 square meters of 407 square meters of C forest land, 73,602 square meters of D forest land, 13 square meters of forest land, 910 square meters of forest land, 123 square meters of forest land, and 1,453 square meters of F forest land, without obtaining permission from the competent authority.
2. A person who intends to cut standing timber in a forest in violation of the Creation and Management of Forest Resources Act shall obtain permission from the competent authority, but the Defendant, while carrying out a new construction work of a church, cut the aggregate of 17 girs of standing timber, such as 4 girs, girs, girs, 4 girs, etc., that were born on the ground of 116 square meters of the 73,602 square meters of the Do forest land in Ycheon-si, Leecheon-si, and the
Summary of Evidence
1. Legal statement of witness G;
1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;
1. A written statement and a document from the defendant;
1. G statements;
1. Determination as to the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel in the petition for accusation and accusation
1. The Defendant asserts that the Defendant was aware of approximately 600 square meters used as a parking lot among the areas converted to a mountainous district, which is not a mountainous district.
2. The judgment of this court can be seen by the evidence duly adopted and the evidence duly adopted by the court, namely, the Defendant appears to have conducted a survey for construction as the site manager of H, a corporation H, which had been performing a new church construction work. While some of the lands listed in paragraph 1 of the holding, the land appears to be adjacent to the boundary of neighboring land due to the end of the mountainous district, although the slope is complete or soil is exposed, and there is much time to view that standing timber is temporarily lost or soil is exposed during the mountainous district.