2. The Korean Criminal Procedure Act, which takes the principle of trial priority and the principle of directness on the market, has a unique area of sentencing in the first instance, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the first instance court’s sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect it.

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015). In full view of the grounds for sentencing (in particular, the majority of the victims, and the amount of damage) revealed in the oral proceedings of the instant case, the lower court’s sentencing is too large and it cannot be said that the lower court’s sentencing exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion, even if it is considered that certain victims did not have economic damage.

3. The appeal by the defendant is without merit and thus dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.