When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No person shall possess goods identical with or similar to the designated goods on which another person’s registered trademark or any other trademark similar thereto is used for the purpose of transferring or delivering them.

피고인은 2015. 2. 2. 21:40경 서울 중구 B에 있는 C은행 옆 노점에서 등록권리자인 샤넬이 특허청에 제0304800호, 제0055592호로 등록한 ‘샤넬’ 상표가 표시된 지정상품과 동일 또는 유사한 위조 상표가 부착된 머리끈 등 110점 정품가 65,660,000원 상당을 판매할 목적으로 보관하여 샤넬의 상표권을 침해한 것을 비롯하여 별지 범죄일람표 기재와 같이 위 일시, 장소에서 위조 상표가 부착된 상품 3개 품목 합계 274점 정품가 71,890,000원 상당을 판매할 목적으로 보관함으로써 등록권자들의 상표권을 각각 침해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The photograph of seized articles, the list of seizure, and the scene photograph of crackdown;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the trademark register, copy of the trademark register, and appraisal report;

1. Article 93 of the Trademark Act and Article 93 of the same Act regarding criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 97-2 (1) of the Trademark Act that is confiscated;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;