A. According to the overall purport of the statements and arguments by Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 9 (including virtual numbers), the plaintiff acquired the ownership of each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 on June 27, 2012, the defendant Eul acquired the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2, and the defendant C occupied each real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1.

According to the above facts, the Plaintiff, the owner of each real estate listed in the separate sheet 1 and 2, and the Defendant A, the real estate listed in the separate sheet 2, and the Defendant C, the obligation to deliver each real estate listed in the separate sheet 1.

B. As to this, the Defendants asserted to the effect that they lawfully possess the same as the lien holder with respect to each of the above real estate. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that there exists a lien against the Defendants.

2. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable.