폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동재물손괴등)
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.
If the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a member of the clan, and Defendant B is an agent entrusted by the above D clan E who is going to come into Korea and come into Korea while residing in Canada.
The Defendants entered into a lease contract with the first floor of the second floor of the F Burial Station in D clans Association on a monthly basis of KRW 500,000,000 per month from the outside of the instant G and the deposit of KRW 20,000,000,000 per month, but the Defendants did not notify the D clan Association before the expiration date of the contract to prepare a place to be handled by E, who is a member of the clans Association, and did not notify the fact to G, who is a lessee, for the purpose of preparing a place to be handled by the members of the clans Association, and entered into a sub-lease contract with the lessee to pay 6 million,00,000,000 won for lease deposit and directors
On February 27, 2017, at around 15:00, the Defendants destroyed the utility by removing the part of the container container, which was used in attaching the victim H of the F Burial Station at G in Gwangju-si, by using the knifely knife the part of the container with the corrective device at the top of the knife.e., the victim H (60cm, length 30cm).
When the victim completes the repair work of the front door glass again, on March 2, 2017, the Defendants continued to remove the front door glass (60cm in width, 30cm in length) from the front door glass of the F Burial Station, which is the same place as around 12:00 on March 2, 2017, thereby undermining its utility.
Summary of Evidence
1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements
1. Legal statement of the witness H;
1. A copy of each real estate lease agreement, and the closing of a family council;
1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant's act of recording the facts constituting a legitimate defense or a legitimate act in response to the victim's unlawful management, is not a legitimate representative of the D clan (hereinafter "the clan of this case").
However, the evidence duly examined and adopted by this court is examined.