beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2015.08.12 2015고단152

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On April 1, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud in the early branch of the Chuncheon District Court for a prison term of six months, and the above judgment (2014Kadan559) was finalized on April 9, 2015. On May 29, 2014, the Chuncheon District Court sentenced two years of suspension of execution to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, and the above judgment (2013 Godan10) was finalized on June 6, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

On February 2, 2014, the Defendant obtained a loan from the Chuncheon District Court under the name of another person and purchased a motor vehicle for the purpose of purchasing money for the purpose of purchasing a motor vehicle and selling the motor vehicle, and obtained pecuniary benefits by inducing B to enter into a loan agreement for the purpose of purchasing a motor vehicle and to repay the loan, etc. (the above Chuncheon District Court 2013No. 1010). On the ground of fraud, the Defendant was tried to obtain a judgment (the above Chuncheon District Court 2013No. 1010) on the ground that he/she acquired pecuniary benefits by purchasing a motor vehicle under the name of another person, and purchased a motor vehicle for the purpose of using it

1. On February 2014, the Defendant committed the CMF7 car-related crime stated that “A vehicle shall not be purchased in the name of the victim F in the name of the passenger with a bad credit standing,” and that “A vehicle shall not receive national incentives from its children if the vehicle has a high engine displacement.” The vehicle will purchase the vehicle in its four names and transfer its vehicle registration name in its name after the month of the week, and then transfer its payment for the purchase of the vehicle to its own name after the month of the week.”

However, in fact, even if the defendant delivered a vehicle under the victim's name, he was a plan to lend the vehicle to a third party and did not have the purpose of operating the vehicle in a normal way, and the defendant bears a large amount of obligation to financial institutions.