except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant committed any of the following crimes under the state that he/she has a lack of ability to discern things or make decisions due to his/her own illness:

1. On November 24, 2014, at around 08:30 on November 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stolen the victim’s smartphone charging machines owned by the victim E located in the front of the reception stand, using the victim’s fluor in the “D center” located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Jung-gu, Seoul; and (b) stolen it by putting the test color bags with a total of KRW 200,000,000 in the market price, including one fluor, and one fluor.

2. On November 29, 2014, around November 29, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed theft, taking advantage of the gaps in which the victim F was placed on the charge of charging transportation cards in the underground passage of the 13 subway line Seoul Central-gu Seoul Central-gu Seoul Central-gu, Seoul Central-gu, thereby cutting down two cellular phones owned by the victim; (b) two half half of the half and 120,000 won in cash; and (c) one hundred and twenty thousand won in total.

3. On December 12, 2014, at around 09:05 on December 12, 2014, the Defendant stolen the Defendant, using the cresh in the part of the victim J in order to place a food order at the account unit located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, in the first place located in GJ located in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, by taking advantage of the cresh in order to place a food order from the said account unit, the Defendant stolen the Defendant, who used the cresh in the part of the victim’s glargra in the table, one my grab, one my g, one my grab, and one my grab, and two copies of passbooks, with a total of KRW 700,00,000,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of each damaged article, cinematographic materials extracted, and photographs of seized articles;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

2. Mitigation of mental disorders and injuries under Articles 10 (2) and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

3. former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

4. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is the suspended sentence.