교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is a person who drives a K5-car on duty.
On August 27, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on August 22:12, 2018, and driven the three-lane in front of the DCheongju Factory, Heung-gu, Goju-si, Goju-si, with the distance of air-saving distance from E to E, the two-lanes in speed of about 65.2km/h speed.
At this point, it is a 50km road with a restricted speed and a rained road with a distance of 50km where traffic is not controlled, so the surface was milched.
In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed of 20% of the road and prevent accidents in advance because the driver of a motor vehicle well sees the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of operation of the motor vehicle.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and received the part before left-hand 40km/h in front of the left-hand side of the vehicle driving by the victim F, who was driven by the victim F, who was driven by the victim F, who was left-hand on the road due to the negligence in excess of 25.2km/h.
As a result, the defendant suffered an injury to the victim F by negligence in the course of his duties, which is about two weeks of treatment.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. The police statement concerning F;
1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, report on the actual condition of a traffic accident, investigation report on the actual condition of a traffic accident, photographs, case settlement report, and traffic accident analysis report;
1. Previous Records: Criminal history records, investigation reports (Attachment of summary order), each of the accused and the defense counsel in the summary order of this case dispute whether the original limit of the road of this case is 50km or not, and furthermore, the milch speed of the road of this case should be reduced by 20%. However, according to each of the above evidence, since the road of this case is set off on the road where a signboard of 50km speed at the time of restriction is installed, the surface is milch and the defendant does not turn on headlights.