However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle with gender C.

On October 16, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 14:00, and operated the intersection of the private street in front of the E cafeteria located in Simsan-si, Simsan-si, directly from the Gyeongsan-si to the side of the watch.

Since there is a long distance crossing where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving of a car has a duty of care to safely drive the car in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by negligence in contravention of the red signal signal, received the part of the Defendant’s front part of the passenger car in front of the left part and the front part of the passenger car in front of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle, which was driven by the victim F (Y, 43 years old) drive GNEW EF rocketing and the left part at the same time with the front line in the front of the front line at the front of the police box of the Marin. 1, 200.

Ultimately, the Defendant by such occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim F, such as base salt, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of treatment on the part of the victim H (V, 42 years of age) who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle, and suffered injury to the victim I (V, 47 years of age) who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle with no head open in need of treatment for about two weeks of treatment, and suffered injury to the victim J (V, South, 48 years of age) who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle with approximately two weeks of treatment, such as dynasium and tension in need of treatment, on the part of the victim J (V, South, 48 years of age) who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle, for about six weeks of treatment at the end of six weeks of treatment, such as dynasium in detail at the end of six weeks of treatment, and on the part of the victim K (V (V, 55 years of age) who is the passenger of the Defendant’s vehicle, as necessary for treatment of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Photographss of CCTV images to be cut and photographs directly taken by the victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Articles 3(1) and 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, concerning criminal facts.