When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is also a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle.

On November 7, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 18:50, and driven the road of the two-lanes in front of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, along a one-lane from the scarcity to the scarb of the session distance.

At the time, there was a lot of traffic for people, and there was a four-lane road from the center without separation, so there was a duty of care to prevent traffic accidents in advance by driving safely by checking whether or not there was a person driving a motor vehicle, who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle, by safely checking whether or not there was a person driving a motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and got the victim F (the age of 69) who illegally crossed the road on the right side from the left side of the moving direction of the defendant's vehicle to go beyond the road by taking the defendant's vehicle into account.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim’s death by occupational negligence on November 8, 2015, by blood taking care of the victim, while sending the victim to the Seomun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 50-1 Dobroon hospital as the head of Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant transferred the victim to the 50-1 Dobroon hospital.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A written statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to autopsy records and autopsy records;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense.

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The vehicles operated by the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are covered by a comprehensive insurance, and the defendant separately pays 30 million won to his bereaved family members, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant. The occurrence of the accident in this case resulted in the negligence of the victim who illegally crossed the road, and the defendant does not have any criminal records of probation or heavier.