However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 25, 2013, from around 18:30 of the same month to around 18:403 of the same month, the Defendant: (a) installed 15 spin-style games, an electronic e-mail game; (b) set up 10,000 won per 10,000 won for many unspecified customers who find the place; and (c) operated the game by exchanging 10,000 won per 10,000 won for each game result.

Accordingly, the defendant was engaged in speculative activities as a business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing appraisal and reply;

1. Article 30 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Regulation and Punishment of Specific Crimes, such as Relevant Provisions of the relevant Acts and selective speculative acts, etc.; Selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act: Consideration of various circumstances, such as the number of games set up by the defendant, duration of business, occupation, and home environment of the defendant, in which speculative businesses are favorable to the point that they are crimes that undermine sound social formation: The fact that the defendant has no criminal records of the same kind; the fact that the defendant reflects the crime; the number of games set up by the defendant;