beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2018.06.19 2018고단157

특수폭행등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 06:40 on June 19, 2017, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol in the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D (Inn, 49 years of age) who was in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si; (b) talked with the victim that “I will leave the Fccin taxi in the car page operated by the Singu, because I do not get any customer, I would like to go out of the me; (c) I would like to say, “I would like to go out of the me because I would not get any customer,” and (d) I would like to see that I would like to say, “I would like to go back, I would like to go back, I would like to go against the part of the victim who was the victim by devokinging the franck, which is a dangerous thing for the victim’s face.”

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

2. No person who violates the Emergency Medical Service Act shall interfere with rescue and emergency treatment or medical treatment of an emergency patient engaged in providing emergency medical services by means of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, threat of force or other means, or destroy or damage or occupy medical facilities, machinery, drugs or other objects for emergency medical services of a medical institution, etc.;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around 07:40 on June 19, 2017, at the emergency room of the H hospital located in Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, the Defendant: (a) stated that the nurse “X-ray photographing” was “satising” for the purpose of checking the face of the nurse I; (b) stated that the nurse “X-ray photographing” was “satising” and the nurse who was in charge of emergency medical services in the above emergency room for about 10 minutes; and (c) caused the emergency doctor to satise, the Defendant was able to avoid disturbance by means of deletion, depending on the facts recognized by the evidence, such as the discovery of the emergency doctor.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the emergency rescue treatment or treatment of emergency patients by force of those engaged in emergency medical services.

3. On June 19, 201, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, as described in paragraph (2) above, around 08:10.