약속어음금
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The Plaintiff’s assertion asserts that the Defendants exercised their rights under the bill against the Defendants, who are the issuer, on December 9, 2016, on the grounds that the Defendants were duly endorsed and transferred from D a promissory note issued in the face value of KRW 50 million and the payee D.
2. If the purport of each statement in Gap evidence 1-1 and 2 is added to the purport of the entire pleadings, a promissory note (certificate No. 1) presented by the plaintiff as the basis for the claim of this case can be acknowledged that the plaintiff was made only on the front side of the face of a promissory note paper, not on a promissory note paper, signed by the defendant C by facsimile, but on the front side of the face of the face of the face of the face of the face of the face of the face value of the face value of the face value of the face value of the face value of the face value of the face value of the face value of the face value of the face value
A bill, in the form of securities, is created and its rights are distributed only through the preparation of securities. As above, even if the bill was signed by Defendant C in the front column of the paper for the facsimile paper, it cannot be deemed as an act of issuing a promissory note, and even if the bill was written on the back of the paper for facsimile, the rights in the bill can not be deemed to have been distributed.
If so, the plaintiff's assertion of exercising the right under the bill is without merit, on the premise that the right under the bill was legally issued.
3. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed as a result of the conclusion.