If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 07:20 on the front side of the C District, located in Busan YY-gu, Busan YY-gu; (b) d and fare-related problems, which are the engineers of the taxi that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol; (c) d and knicked in the taxi while having been sent to the taxi; and (d) knicked the horses, “I am out of the taxi cost calculation and returning home,” which were called “I am out,” which was called “I am back. I do not son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son, son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son.” On the same day, around 07:25, the Defendant sent to the Defendant at the above C District.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E and F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Obstructing the legitimate execution of official duties for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be punished strictly.

However, considering the fact that the defendant shows an attitude against the defendant, and that he did not have a criminal record due to the early birth of society, the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, etc., the punishment is determined as ordered by considering various sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments in this case, such as the circumstances after the crime.