However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

No person shall interfere with emergency treatment or examination and treatment of emergency patients by means of violence, intimidation, threat, force, etc. of persons engaged in emergency medical services.

Nevertheless, on July 8, 2017, the Defendant received medical treatment at the C Emergency Service Center located in Seocho-si B on July 8, 2017, and continued to provide a doctor on duty and a nurse who provides medical treatment to other patients while visiting the hospital without having received a request for discharge from a medical doctor.

“I”, “Is If you wish to do so.”

By 03:25 on the same day, the emergency room door was opened up to 03:25 minutes from the same day, such as she saw, she was unable to provide first aid and treatment to emergency medical service workers by force for about one hour and six minutes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 60 (1) 1 and 12 of the relevant Act on the Punishment of Criminal Crimes and the Emergency Medical Service Act on the Selection of Punishment, Articles 60 (1) 1 and 12 of the same Act and the selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the defendant reflects the crime, the crime of this case was committed under the influence of alcohol in spite of the past record of criminal punishment several times due to violent crimes, and the duration of interference is not shorter, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, background, means and consequence of the crime, etc. shall be determined as per the order, taking into account all the circumstances of sentencing, such as the following circumstances.