When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant, as the representative of the company B, owns approximately 400 goods worth KRW 43,702,00 in the market price of Kim finished goods kept in the factory of the company B located in Seo-gu, Incheon, and the second floor.

The enforcement officer D belonging to the Incheon District Court attached the above goods at the factory B on October 26, 2016 by the original copy of the Incheon District Court 2015Kadan 245786, which was delegated by the creditor E to the creditor E, and attached a seizure mark on the goods.

However, on November 2016, the Defendant removed without permission a seizure mark attached to the above goods at a factory B company, thereby impairing its utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to seizure records of corporeal movables, or protocol which is impossible to sell corporeal movables;

1. Article 140 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 140 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is against the Defendant’s mistake, and that the instant Kim finished product is not owned by the Defendant, the same type as the order shall be determined.