2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

A. On August 13, 201, the Plaintiff was receiving medical care for the period of medical care from the Defendant on May 7, 201, for the period of medical care from August 13, 201 to February 6, 2012, where another taxi was under the diagnosis of “the instant accident (3, 4, 5, and 11) of the cage cage cage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sage sages, and other eass eage eage sage sage sage sage fage sage sages.

B. On September 3, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional medical care on the ground that the status of the fage at the left-hand side (11) of the fages of the above soldiers continues to exist, and that medical treatment, such as operation, is necessary for the unity thereof. However, on September 25, 2013, the Defendant was showing symptoms more than two years since the disaster occurred, the need for surgery was not required, and the Plaintiff’s application was not approved (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

【Based on Recognition】 Each entry of Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1 and 5 (including the number number);

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion is unlawful in the disposition of this case where the plaintiff's application for additional medical care was not approved by the defendant, even though it is necessary to treat the bones transplant, internal organs, or non-conformity removal in order to remove such a certificate, etc., for more than 2 years after the treatment was completed.

B. (i) The Plaintiff’s treatment process was received respectively from the Seocho-gu Hospital from August 13, 201 to September 17, 201 after the instant accident, and from September 17, 201, from September 17, 201 to September 28, 201, respectively, from the Seoul Hospital, and from KRW B, from September 28, 201, and thereafter, complaining of the pains around the catus catus.