When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 27, 2015, at around 20:40, the Defendant was urged to return home from D to the police station of the Msan-dong Police Station C where the Defendant was dispatched after receiving a report from B by the 112 police officer who was sent to the police station of the Msan-dong Police Station at around 20:40, 3.15, the Msan-si, the Masan-si, the Masan-si, the Masan-si, the Masan-si, the Masan-si, the Masan-si, the Masan-si.

"To make a bath as it is, and to do so, D's double and bridge 2 to 3 times and breath, and ballebbbling.

The Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each protocol of statement to D or B prepared by the police;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of a selective fine for punishment (such as the recognition of his/her mistake and reflection of his/her depth, and the absence of any previous conviction);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;