청구이의
Cheongju District Court Decision 201Na 11938 decided February 12, 2020 against the plaintiff (i.e., the plaintiff).
1. Basic facts
A. On April 23, 2015, the first accident C caused an accident that, while driving a SM5 vehicle at around 10:20 on April 23, 2015, the Defendant shocked an Awdidi vehicle driving in front of the Gu office located in front of the Gu office, which is equivalent to 69 a.m. a.m. in front of the Gu office, and caused the shock of the street trees (hereinafter referred to as the “first accident”).
B. On June 22, 2015, the Defendant of the second accident: (a) left the Plaintiff Company with repair, and (b) left the Plaintiff Company’s employees to deliver the said son’s vehicle to the Defendant, which was repaired around 18:35 on June 22, 2015; and (c) shocked the Defendant’s bridge with the said son’s vehicle (hereinafter the instant second accident).
(c)
The insurer E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “E”) is the insurer of the foregoing SM5 vehicle, which is the insurer of the vehicle comprehensive vehicle insurance for the foregoing SM5 vehicle, which is the vehicle damaged by interest, and the vehicle comprehensive vehicle insurance for the K3 vehicle, which is a separate vehicle owned by the Defendant.
(d)
The Defendant filed a lawsuit for damages (i.e., 2015 A), 110683 (i.e., 110683) in the previous lawsuit. The Defendant’s claim related to the second accident of this case against D, who is a driver, was an unlawful offender. At the same time, as the Defendant’s claim for damages for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff Company, as the insurer of the non-insured special contract for the accident of D’s non-insurance for K3 vehicles, as the insurer of the non-insured accident of D, and sought for the payment of the insurance proceeds for the damages incurred by the Defendant. On the other hand, the Defendant sought two million won of disability insurance proceeds and two million won of the injury insurance proceeds in accordance with the terms and conditions of his own physical accident of D Co., Ltd., and the purport of the claim was that the Plaintiff Co., Ltd. sought for damages related to D and D, D and D, D, 461,788,785 won, and D, and 4057,197.