2. Although the previous judgment was made, it is necessary to impose severe punishment in light of the fact that the crime of this case was committed during the period of repeated crime.

However, in full view of the fact that damage is relatively minor, the confession and reflect of a crime, and the other reasons for sentencing specified in the arguments and records of the instant case, the lower court appears to have been reasonably determined by fully considering all the circumstances, including the various reasons for sentencing asserted by the prosecutor, and no special circumstance exists to the extent that the sentence of the lower court is to be changed.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.