소유권이전등록절차 인수청구
1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:
The defendant shall regard the motor vehicles listed in the attached list from the plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. On June 17, 2005, the Plaintiff: (a) acquired and operated a motor vehicle as indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “the instant motor vehicle”) from a person with no name to a police officer; and (b) did not complete the registration of transfer of ownership; and (c) returned the instant motor vehicle again to a person with no name to a person with no name, around June 17,
(A) According to the statement on June 3, 2005, the automobile insurance contract entered into between the fire insurance company of this case and the same fire insurance company of this case from June 3, 2005 to June 3, 2006 can be recognized as being replaced by the vehicle on June 17, 2005).
In the lawsuit of demanding the acquisition of the procedure of the ownership transfer registration against the Plaintiff, which was a new owner on the registration register of the instant automobile, filed by Daejeon District Court Branching 2014Kadan20581, the said court rendered a judgment on May 12, 2015 that “the Plaintiff shall take over the procedure of ownership transfer registration for the instant automobile from C on October 27, 2002,” and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
Accordingly, after completing the ownership transfer registration on the instant motor vehicle on July 16, 2015, the Plaintiff is registered as the owner in the instant motor vehicle register until now.
C. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against D (K) on the ground that there is no evidence to acknowledge that D purchased the instant vehicle on January 12, 2016, and rather D was married with the Defendant on December 17, 1999, and consultation was reached on May 17, 2010. Around December 14, 2005 during the period of marriage, the Plaintiff dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim on the ground that D (E) purchased the instant vehicle through a motor vehicle dealer, etc. and operated it after purchasing the instant vehicle in the name of D, and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.
Insurance companies.