The appeal is dismissed.

2. It is reasonable to take into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant’s mistake is deeply divided and reflected in his/her depth; (b) there is no criminal history for the same kind of crime; and (c) who, alone, raises his/her father and wife.

However, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant with five smugglings for six months and arranging commercial sex acts for the business of employing employees. In light of the period of the crime, the attitude of the crime, etc., the responsibility for the act of arranging commercial sex acts is heavy, and the act of arranging commercial sex acts is not much harmful to society by commercializing women's sex and impairing the sound sexual culture and good morals. The purpose of collection under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. is to deprive the defendant of unlawful profits from the crime of this case in order to eradicate the act of arranging commercial sex acts, etc., the collection of additional collection under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Commercial Sex Acts, etc. must be made. Accordingly, the scope of the recommended sentence for the crime of this case according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Sentencing Committee of the Supreme Court shall be collected from six months to four months. The scope of the recommended sentence for the crime of this case shall be limited to the punishment of this case in accordance with the sentencing guidelines established by the Sentencing Committee of the Supreme Court.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.