However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

1. On August 13, 2015, the Defendant: “D”, “E” and “E” and “B” in the name column of the victim’s name in the column of resident registration number; “G” and “G” in the phone name column; “G” and “G” in the column of the Defendant’s name; “W” in the column of the phone name; “G in the column of the seat of the company; “K in the column of the reason for withdrawal; “I to establish an agreement to resolve the claim group; “I will not want punishment” in the column of the Ministry of Employment and Labor; “I will not want to be punished; “E” and “I will not voluntarily withdraw his name and affix his/her seal to the column of the High Employment and Labor Office; “I will not withdraw his/her name and affix his/her seal to the P.D.”; “I” and “I will not withdraw his/her name and seal to the P.D. name and seal to the column of the date”; and “I will not withdraw his/her name and seal to the column.”

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged 8 copies of the withdrawal of the complaint in the name of D, J, K, K, L, M, N,O, P, a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. On October 30, 2015, Defendant B submitted the forged withdrawal of a complaint to a public official under his/her name in the 1st floor public service center of the Jung-gu District Court, 209, Goyang-gu, Goyang-si, Goyang-si, Goyang-si, the first floor public service center of the first floor, which was located in 209, as seen above, as if he/she

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A statement of withdrawal of complaint;

1. Application of some of the court records of high aid 2015 high aid 2015 high aid 3481, criminal investigation reports (verification as to whether a written withdrawal of a complaint is authentic), and criminal investigation reports (verification as to whether a written withdrawal of a complaint has been submitted

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

A. Defendant A: Article 231 of the Criminal Act

B. Defendant B: Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Code

1. Defendant B of the ordinary concurrence: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendants’ choice of punishment: Imprisonment with prison labor

1. Defendant A from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act.