When the Defendant gets a skiing and skis, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents by regulating the direction and speed of the skiing in order to prevent the skis from being faced by another person in the vicinity, and by ensuring that the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so and led the victim D (ma, 23 years old) who was engaged in skiing practice in front of the ski scam in front of the ski scam, and shocked the back side of the ski scam.

As a result, the Defendant caused the victim to injure the victim’s salt, tension, etc., which is the right-hand part of the three weeks period of medical treatment.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are those falling under Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 266(2) of the Criminal Act.

However, since the victim explicitly expressed his/her intention not to want punishment against the defendant on April 16, 2020 and May 27, 2020, which was after the prosecution of this case, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.