2. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance, the fact that the defendant, while working as a source of the above office at each time and at each place of the judgment of the court of first instance, has embezzled the fact that the defendant paid the above money to the defendant, and on the contrary, there is no evidence to support the defendant's assertion that the defendant paid the above money to the defendant in the office after paying it to the defendant, and the defendant was placed in the office. Furthermore, according to the witness E's testimony of the court of first instance, the fact that the victim is directly managed by correcting the office's safe. Thus, the defendant cannot arbitrarily list the above office's safe or put money into the office.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit.