Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the facts charged in the instant case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

There is no error of law by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on “an indication or advertisement with contents likely to have efficacy or effect in preventing and treating diseases or to mislead or confuse them as medicine” as prescribed by the Health Functional Foods Act.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.