A. The sentence of the court below (six months of imprisonment) declared by the prosecutor is too unhued and unfair.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. We also examine the prosecutor's and the defendant's arguments.

The defendant has been subject to punishment several times for the same crime, such as the confession of the crime of this case and the fact that the number of crimes is one time and the amount of fraud is not much than 2.10,000 won, and the defendant has been subject to punishment several times for the same crime. In particular, the defendant repeats the behavior of committing the crime of this case without any scambling, even though he was sentenced to punishment for the same crime and completed the execution of the sentence and released from the office, it is highly likely to criticize the defendant by taking high level of the crime of this case at amusement centers, etc. differently from the general lifeless crime of this case. The defendant, upon receiving a report from the victim at the time of the crime of this case, sent a warrant of arrest by informing him of his intention to make the last drinking value after being called, and the defendant has been issued a warrant of arrest by again informing him of the false contact with him, and there is no other reason to view the defendant's motive, motive, and attitude of the crime of this case as being disadvantageous to the police officer after being arrested.

3. In conclusion, since each appeal by the prosecutor and the defendant is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.