임대차보증금반환 등 청구의 소
1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 193,00,000.
2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.
3. Of the costs of lawsuit.
Basic Facts
On April 4, 2014, the Plaintiff leased a deposit deposit of KRW 200 million, monthly rent of KRW 100,000,000, and from June 1, 2014 to May 31, 2016, the lease term of KRW 29.75 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) from the Defendant among Dsanbu and the building located in Ischeon-si, Leecheon-si, as well as KRW 29.75 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”).
(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). Since then, the Plaintiff received delivery of the instant building from the Defendant and operated a pharmacy in the name of “E-Contracting”.
On the other hand, at the time of concluding the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff paid KRW 50 million to the Defendant as premium in addition to the rental deposit. On May 8, 2014, the Plaintiff paid KRW 50 million to the Defendant as premium.
After the conclusion of the instant lease agreement, the Plaintiff paid only monthly rent to the Defendant up to October 2015, and thereafter, the Plaintiff did not pay monthly rent under the instant lease agreement until then.
[Ground of recognition] The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff is not able to continue to operate a pharmacy any longer due to the absence of dispute, the entries in Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including the number of each branch number), the purport of the whole pleadings, and the claim for the refund of the deposit for lease, and the purport of the whole pleadings.
On April 2015, the Plaintiff expressed to the Defendant that it is impossible to maintain the lease relationship of this case.
On May 27, 2015, the Plaintiff agreed on May 27, 2015 to terminate the instant lease agreement with the Defendant’s agent F, the chief of the management department, F, G, the chief of the Defendant hospital.
Therefore, the defendant is liable to pay to the plaintiff the amount of KRW 200 million equivalent to the deposit deposit and damages for delay.
The Defendant did not agree with the Plaintiff on the termination of the instant lease agreement.
The instant lease agreement on May 31, 2016.