However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a KS7 car.

On November 24, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car on the 19:23th of November 24, 2017, and proceeded at a speed of about 50 km from the south side of the racing to the south of the racing along the two lanes in front of the D coffee shop at the time of racing.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed prior to entering the intersection and to prevent the accident by safely driving the motor vehicle in accordance with the signals while keeping the traffic situation at the right and right and right and right.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and, even though the vehicle driving signal on the intersection before entering the intersection was changed to a yellow stop signal, the Defendant intruded with the center line due to the negligence that was going through the intersection as is, and got off from the south side of the racing along the front side of the victim E (56 tax) driving a 125CC driving on the south side of the racing at the same lane.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim, such as the right-free kne kne, free will, etc., which requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a survey report on actual condition, a site photograph, a photo of the scene after an accident, a photo of the damaged vehicle of the victim, a photo of the victim's vehicle photograph, a criminal investigation report (a photograph of a visual closure, CD attachment), and a photograph by capturing a black boom;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment without prison labor, concerning criminal facts;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of recommendation] of the general traffic accident category 1 (Bodily Injury resulting from traffic accidents) (one month to eight months) is mitigated (the victim is a special mitigated person).