However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 12, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3 million for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Changwon District Court's Jinju branch, and a summary order of KRW 6 million for the same crime from the Gwangju District Court's Net Branch on March 25, 2013, respectively.

On June 14, 2020, at around 00:45, the Defendant driven an Epoter flobbbbing truck with approximately 1.2 km of blood alcohol concentration of about 0.20% from the 1.2km section from the front of the D community hall located in Gyang-si, Hannam-gun to the front of the D community hall in Gyangyang-si.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation report (report on the circumstances of an immigration driver);

1. A written appraisal of blood alcohol;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal history records, reply reports (A), investigation reports (Attachment to a summary order of the same kind of power), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes of Part I of the relevant case list;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (including the cases where he/she commits an error, etc.);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1)

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act to provide community service or attend lectures;