Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, one day shall be 10.

On December 3, 2018, the defendant tried to carry out an act of removal as a daily worker who carried out an act of removal at the Lee Jae-do Center, and on December 3, 2018, the defendant did not have to carry out an act of removal as a result of the introduction of the victim B.

At around 09:29 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) at the address of the Defendant located in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, for the reason that the victim introduced the employee of another worker on duty on behalf of the Defendant to the said day on the same day; (b) there is only the victim “ despite the fact that D and the warden were not in a non-dispact relationship with the victim; (c) the victim is suffering from the Plaintiff; and (d) the flussium flusium flusium; and (d) the flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flu

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the reception of letters;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;