2. Although the Defendant had been punished for the same kind of crime under the same law several times, the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case before and after the commission of the crime of this case, which took advantage of waste materials, etc. at the construction site, and committed each of the crimes of this case before and after the commission of the fine around March 2019, even though the Defendant committed the same crime around August 2019.

On the other hand, there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant reflects the defendant's wrong, the victim E andO agreed, the victim H wanting to take the defendant's preference, the living criminal, the defendant's support for the undecent net old age with good health, etc.

In full view of such circumstances and all of the sentencing conditions as shown in the instant argument and the scope of the recommended sentencing guidelines, it cannot be deemed that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is groundless.