2. The costs of quasi-examination and those of retrial shall be considered.

A. On November 13, 2014 of Suwon District Court case 2014Na15658 (principal lawsuit), 2014Na27279 (Counterclaim), the defendant's assertion that he did not notify the application for an order to submit documents on November 13, 2014, the Suwon District Court 2014Na15658 (principal lawsuit), or 2014Na27279 (Counterclaim) was dismissed on January 23, 2015; the defendant's allegation that he did not notify the request for verification was dismissed on January 23, 2015, the Suwon District Court 2014Na15658 (principal lawsuit), 2014Na279 (Counterclaim) of the Civil Procedure Act, which was pending on the application of the plaintiff, constitutes the only evidence under the proviso of Article 290 of the Civil Procedure Act to prove that the plaintiff has no right to retention on the apartment of this case; the court may apply for an immediate appeal against the plaintiff's respective order to submit preparatory documents on January 13, 2014, 2014.

However, the part on the omission of judgment among the grounds for quasi-deliberation asserted by the defendant constitutes an important matter that may affect the case on the merits, but the final judgment on the case on the merits is rendered.